Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288648›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Intensive care physicians' experiences of decision fatigue and characteristics of vulnerable clinical decisions.

Lorenz Schiessl, Anne Herrmann, Richard-Felix Kraus, Viktoria Kimmerling, Johanna Rosenberger, Cynthia Kohl, Martin Georg Kees, Alexander Leonhard Leibold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorenz SchiesslDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef- Strauss-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Anne HerrmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Richard-Felix KrausDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef- Strauss-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Viktoria KimmerlingDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef- Strauss-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Johanna RosenbergerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef- Strauss-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Cynthia KohlUniversity Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinic St. Hedwig of The Order of St. John, University of Regensburg, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93049, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin Georg KeesDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef- Strauss-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Alexander Leonhard LeiboldDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef- Strauss-Alle 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. alexander.leibold@ukr.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision fatigue (DF) has been proposed to describe changes in decision-making over the course of repeated decisions, but its mechanisms and relevance in clinical practice remain debated. While quantitative studies have reported time-related patterns in medical decisions, qualitative evidence on how DF is experienced and managed in everyday clinical settings is limited. Intensive care units (ICUs), characterised by high decision density, time pressure, and uncertainty, provide a particularly relevant context to explore these processes. This study explored intensive care physicians' views and experiences on DF and its potential impact on medical decision making in the ICU. 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted in person with ICU physicians from October 2024 to March 2025. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Codes and categories were iteratively developed and grouped into higher-level themes and decision characteristics. 19 physicians from three different ICUs participated, including 13 residents and board-certified specialists in executing roles and 6 consultants with supervisory and treatment-planning responsibilities. Three major themes were identified and developed: (1) DF and mental exhaustion occur in the ICU; (2) Perceived effects of DF on decision-making processes and behaviours; and (3) physicians indicate various characteristics of decisions in which the effects of DF are more likely to occur. This study provides new insights into ICU physicians' experiences of DF and presents a typology of clinical decisions according to their perceived susceptibility to DF as a hypothesis-generating framework. The findings suggest practical implications for workflow design, decision prioritisation, and team-based approaches to support clinical decision-making in the ICU.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingCritical CareFatiguePhysiciansAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedTime PressureClinical decision makingDecision fatigueIntensive care unitPatient safetyQualitative researchSemi-structured interviewStaff wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42288648
PMCPMC13264608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.