ArticleScientific reports2026
Intensive care physicians' experiences of decision fatigue and characteristics of vulnerable clinical decisions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers to Protocol Adherence in Emergency Departments and Evidence-Based Strategies for Successful Implementation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision fatigue (DF) has been proposed to describe changes in decision-making over the course of repeated decisions, but its mechanisms and relevance in clinical practice remain debated. While quantitative studies have reported time-related patterns in medical decisions, qualitative evidence on how DF is experienced and managed in everyday clinical settings is limited. Intensive care units (ICUs), characterised by high decision density, time pressure, and uncertainty, provide a particularly relevant context to explore these processes. This study explored intensive care physicians' views and experiences on DF and its potential impact on medical decision making in the ICU. 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted in person with ICU physicians from October 2024 to March 2025. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Codes and categories were iteratively developed and grouped into higher-level themes and decision characteristics. 19 physicians from three different ICUs participated, including 13 residents and board-certified specialists in executing roles and 6 consultants with supervisory and treatment-planning responsibilities. Three major themes were identified and developed: (1) DF and mental exhaustion occur in the ICU; (2) Perceived effects of DF on decision-making processes and behaviours; and (3) physicians indicate various characteristics of decisions in which the effects of DF are more likely to occur. This study provides new insights into ICU physicians' experiences of DF and presents a typology of clinical decisions according to their perceived susceptibility to DF as a hypothesis-generating framework. The findings suggest practical implications for workflow design, decision prioritisation, and team-based approaches to support clinical decision-making in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.