ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating hygienic practices in cattle slaughterhouses and beef retail shops in Sidama region, Ethiopia: implications for public health.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foodborne diseases are a major global health problem driven by gaps in regulatory enforcement, resources, and food handler education. This study aimed to assess hygienic practices among slaughterhouse and retail shop workers in Hawassa city, Sidama, Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2022 to June 2023, involving 190 participants (40 abattoir workers and 150 retail shop workers) using structured questionnaires and direct observation. Significant hygiene lapses were observed, including the absence of hot water baths for cleaning knives, lack of handwashing sinks, and insufficient use of protective gear in abattoirs. In retail shops, risky behaviors such as displaying uncovered meat, lack of cooling facilities, and improper sanitation practices were prevalent. Only 45% of abattoir workers and 21% of retail shop workers demonstrated good meat handling practices. Notably, food safety training (AOR = 5.03, 95% CI = 1.09-23.22, P = 0.038) was significantly associated with better hygiene practices among abattoir workers. Among retail shop workers, both food safety training (AOR = 3.96, 95% CI = 1.30-12.07, P = 0.016) and higher educational level (AOR = 5.42, 95% CI = 1.62-18.11, P = 0.008) were significantly associated with better hygiene practices. The study concludes that inadequate education and limited training are key contributors to poor meat handling practices. It recommends the implementation of comprehensive training programs, ongoing education, and regular monitoring to improve compliance with food safety regulations and reduce the risk of foodborne diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.