Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288638›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

On the smart coordination of flexibility scheduling in multi-carrier integrated energy systems.

Christian Doh Dinga, Sander van Rijn, Laurens J de Vries, Milos Cvetkovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian Doh DingaDepartment of Electrical Sustainable Energy, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands. c.dohdinga@tudelft.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1905-8221
Sander van RijnEnvironment and Sustainability Section, Netherlands eScience Center, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-041X
Laurens J de VriesDepartment of Engineering Systems and Services, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4014-9294
Milos CvetkovicDepartment of Electrical Sustainable Energy, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5169-7368

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ESI.2019.004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinating the interactions among flexibility assets in multi-carrier integrated energy systems (MIES) can lead to a cost-efficient energy transition. However, the proliferation of flexibility assets and their growing participation in active demand response increases the complexity of coordinating these interactions. This paper investigates several approaches to model the coordination of flexibility scheduling in MIES with many autonomous flexibility providers. We propose runtime model coupling as an alternative modeling paradigm to overcome the limitations of monolithic centralized co-optimization. Specifically, we introduced two model coupling approaches-a distributed price-response and a decentralized market auction approach-to address practical challenges such as preserving the autonomy and privacy of flexibility providers while ensuring scalability. We conduct a quantitative benchmark of these approaches against co-optimization across varying problem sizes, complexities, and computing infrastructures. This benchmark provides new empirical insights into the trade-offs between optimality, autonomy, and scalability that have so far remained unquantified in the energy system literature. We show that model coupling offers a method to balance optimality and realism (autonomy and privacy) while delivering substantial scalability gains. The proposed model coupling approaches are formalized as open-source software with several practical applications: modelers can experiment with different flexibility modeling approaches and choose the one that best matches their modeling objectives and constraints; flexibility providers can couple their models to simulate interactions between their systems to make informed operational decisions without disclosing any confidential information.

Indexed as

Co-simulationDemand flexibilityDemand responseDistributed energy resourcesDistributed optimizationElectricity marketsEnergy economicsEnergy system integrationModel couplingMulti-agent simulationMulti-energy systems

Identifiers

PMID42288638
PMCPMC13518802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.