ArticleScientific reports2026
Dual-adaptive imputation graph neural network for knowledge-aware recommendation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recommender systems play a vital role in enhancing user experience by efficiently delivering personalized and relevant content. While knowledge graph-based recommender systems effectively alleviate the data sparsity and cold-start challenges of traditional approaches, they still suffer from two major limitations: (1) insufficient utilization of the user-item interaction matrix and (2) suboptimal integration of heterogeneous knowledge graph signals with collaborative information. In this work, we propose DAIGNN (Dual-Adaptive Imputation Graph Neural Network), a novel recommendation framework designed to overcome these limitations through three key innovations. First, we introduce a similarity-driven imputation mechanism that constructs an Imputation Graph using pseudo-ratings, thereby enhancing graph connectivity and significantly reducing data sparsity. Second, we incorporate multiple auxiliary information sources on both the user and item sides, enabling DAIGNN to capture richer contextual and relational semantics beyond conventional user-item interactions. Third, we develop a dual-adaptive feature fusion mechanism that learns optimal fusion weights to dynamically integrate heterogeneous information from multiple graph sources. Extensive experiments conducted on four real-world datasets demonstrate the superior effectiveness of DAIGNN. On average, it achieves a 3.1% improvement in AUC and a 2.0% improvement in F1-score over state-of-the-art baselines, confirming its robustness across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.