ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based artificial intelligence can improve the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction: stratified comparison study and hierarchical Bayesian model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of small bowel obstruction (SBO) is critical to patient outcomes, particularly in the emergency department (ED). To enhance diagnostic precision, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) technology that automatically extracts dilated intestinal segments from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images. 158 contrast-enhanced CT examinations containing 5,200 annotated images were used for deep learning, and the potential utility of AI in improving SBO diagnosis was subsequently evaluated by residents and surgeons. CT images from 30 patients with suspected SBO in the ED were used as a test set. Seventeen residents and ten surgeons were divided into two groups, one interpreting images with AI support and the other without AI. Participants assessed the presence of SBO and identified the obstruction location, and diagnostic time was recorded. A hierarchical Bayesian model was applied for analysis. The median precision, recall, and Dice score of the AI model were 0.98, 0.63, and 0.77, respectively. For both residents and surgeons, the correct diagnosis rate of the obstruction location was significantly higher in the AI-assisted group compared with the non-AI group (74.1% vs. 56.7% and 88.2% vs. 66.2%, respectively; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0001). Among residents, AI support significantly improved the diagnosis of obstruction location (odds ratio: 4.20; 95% credible interval: 2.14-8.26) and reduced reading time by 26.84 s per case (95% credible interval: -50.37 to - 2.83). These findings indicate that AI technology is clinically feasible and can improve diagnostic accuracy while reducing the time required for diagnosing bowel obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.