ArticleScientific reports2026
Propensity-matched comparison of early femoral complications after cementless total hip arthroplasty with different stem designs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) and stem subsidence are major early complications following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, few studies have compared these complications between different femoral stem designs after adjusting for patient characteristics. This study compared the incidence of PFF and stem subsidence between fit-and-fill and tapered-wedge stems in primary cementless THA. A total of 753 THAs using a fit-and-fill stem and 526 using a tapered-wedge stem performed between January 2013 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, radiographic findings, and perioperative complications were analyzed using univariate, multivariate, and propensity score-matched analyses. Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, body mass index, and femoral morphology (Dorr type), resulting in 478 matched THAs in each group. After matching, the rates of perioperative PFF were 2.3% in the fit-and-fill group and 0.6% in the tapered-wedge group (P = 0.026; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-13.5, odds ratio [OR]: 3.7). The rates of ≥ 2-mm stem subsidence were 7.2% and 1.5%, respectively (P = < 0.001; 95% CI: 2.2-11.7, OR: 5.2). These findings suggest that tapered-wedge stems are associated with lower rates of early femoral complications such as PFF and stem subsidence than fit-and-fill stems in cementless THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.