ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrating AI for sustainable architectural space optimization and heritage-conscious street design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The paper presents an AI-powered framework designed to optimize the layout of historical and cultural street spaces while preserving heritage values. Combining deep learning, graph-based techniques, and reinforcement learning, this framework addresses common urban challenges such as pedestrian accessibility, traffic congestion, and environmental sustainability in historic districts. Unlike traditional urban planning methods, the framework offers a dynamic, data-driven approach that adapts to real-time changes in pedestrian flow, traffic, and environmental conditions. By integrating Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spatial feature extraction, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for network connectivity analysis, and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for dynamic layout adjustments, the system ensures efficient and sustainable urban designs. The proposed model was tested in cities with historical significance and demonstrated significant improvements: a 22.5% reduction in congestion, a 27.4% increase in green space, and a 31.8% improvement in pedestrian accessibility compared to traditional methods. The results validate the effectiveness of AI in urban planning, showing that it can balance the need for modernization with the preservation of historical authenticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.