Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288615›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

FairGen: preference-aligned diffusion for demographically equitable medical image synthesis.

Zhimin Li, Ruichen Zhang, Zhen Tan, Howard J Aizenstein, Jingtong Hu, Tianlong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhimin Li *Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ruichen Zhang *Department of Computer Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Zhen Tan *School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Howard J AizensteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jingtong HuSwanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. jthu@pitt.edu.
Tianlong ChenDepartment of Computer Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. tianlong@cs.unc.edu.

Funding

Achieve Fairness in AI-Assisted Mobile Healthcare Apps through Unsupervised Federated LearningR01EB033387 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HU, JINGTONG · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
Robust and Interpretable Multi-modal AI/ML for Precision MedicineR01EB037101 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Tianlong Chen · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB033387NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB037101NIH HHS R01EB033387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging is central to modern diagnostics, and artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly used to support image-based analysis by improving efficiency, accuracy, and access to care. However, inequities in healthcare access and differential disease prevalence create severe demographic imbalances in clinical image data. Such imbalances are compounded by the fact that diseases can manifest with distinct features across demographic groups, rendering certain phenotypic presentations naturally rare. AI models trained on such imbalanced data risk perpetuating diagnostic bias and widening healthcare disparities. Here we introduce FairGen, a fairness-aware diffusion framework that synthesizes demographically balanced medical images while preserving pathology-relevant visual features. By embedding physician-aligned preferences into the generation process, FairGen improves subgroup coverage during synthesis and downstream classification. Applied to dermatology, radiology, and neuroimaging benchmark tasks, FairGen achieves fairness improvements of 95.9% for skin images, 80.0% for chest radiography, and 35.2% for brain MRI, while maintaining competitive diagnostic accuracy relative to models trained on original clinical data. Clinician-facing expert review and external validation on independent cohorts further support that these gains extend beyond standard fidelity metrics and are not confined to the original in-distribution datasets.

Identifiers

PMID42288615
PMCPMC13627665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.