ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning based apple leaf disease detection using spatially modulated continuouslayer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate detection of apple leaf diseases is critical for sustainable agriculture, yet manual diagnosis remains time-consuming and error-prone. This study introduces a novel deep learning framework centered on a custom ContinuousLayer, a spatially adaptive convolutional layer designed to overcome the limitations of standard CNNs. This architecture automates the classification of apple leaf diseases Black rot, rust, scab, and healthy leaves with high precision. The model addresses dataset imbalance through strategic resampling, achieving uniform class distribution. The ContinuousLayer introduces spatial feature modulation using trainable Gaussian basis functions, enhancing feature extraction while penalising kernel irregularities through a hybrid composite loss function. Trained on a dataset of 3,164 images balanced via bicubic up-sampling, and evaluated on a held-out test set of 10% of the data, the model attains a 98.63% test accuracy, with F1-scores ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 across classes. Visual analysis of the confusion matrix reveals minimal misclassification, predominantly between rust and scab. Comparative evaluation against baseline architectures demonstrates the efficacy of the ContinuousLayer in capturing disease-specific spatial patterns. These results underscore the potential of integrating mathematically inspired layers into CNNs for plant pathology applications, offering a highly accurate tool for precision agriculture in controlled environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.