ArticleScientific reports2026
Benchmarking hybrid CNN and transformer backbones with graph convolution networks (GCN) for flower growth-stage classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate recognition of flower growth stages is important for plant phenotyping but remains challenging due to subtle visual differences and limited labeled data. This study proposes a hybrid CNN/Transformer + GCN framework for fine-grained flower growth-stage classification. A new dataset, BD Flower Growth, is introduced with 3,889 original images from eight Bangladeshi flower species, categorized into three stages (early, mid, full), forming 24 classes. The dataset is divided into training and testing sets, with augmentation applied only to the training data. Deep backbone networks are used to extract feature maps, which are transformed into graph representations and refined using Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN). A systematic ablation study is conducted by varying GCN depth (3, 5 layers), node resolution ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and graph construction methods (4-neighbour, 8-neighbour, and KNN with [Formula: see text]). Experimental results show that performance depends strongly on both backbone and graph configuration. The best performance of 97% accuracy is achieved by EfficientNetV2, DenseNet201-based hybrid models, additionally Swin Transformer model shows the largest improvement, increasing from 84% to 97% after GCN integration. Across different settings, grid-based graphs (4- and 8-neighbour) consistently provide more stable and higher performance compared to KNN graphs, while moderate GCN depth (3-5 layers) offers the best balance accuracy. Cross-dataset evaluation on the Oxford 102 Flower dataset further demonstrates the generalization capability of the proposed approach. These findings highlight the effectiveness of hybrid graph-based learning and the importance of graph configuration in improving fine-grained classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.