ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative performance of the ahmed and vertucci systems in classifying mandibular premolar canal morphology: a Bayesian and information-theoretic analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multinational cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study evaluated the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars (M1Ps) from 21 countries and compared how well the Ahmed and Vertucci classification systems represented these patterns. A total of bilateral mandibular first premolars from eligible CBCT scans were assessed using both systems, and the data were analyzed with a hierarchical probabilistic approach to account for population and imaging-related variation. Across the overall dataset, a simple single-canal configuration was the dominant pattern, and this remained the most common finding in all populations despite limited but structured variation in less frequent subclasses. The Ahmed system classified all observed configurations, whereas the Vertucci system left approximately 10.2% of cases without an equivalent category. In addition, Ahmed preserved more anatomical detail, while Vertucci compressed several distinct configurations into broader groups. Demographic and imaging-related factors had modest effects, with voxel size showing the clearest technical influence on the detection of more complex patterns. Overall, M1P morphology showed a stable global pattern with secondary heterogeneity, and the Ahmed system provided a more complete and informative representation for CBCT-based morphology assessment across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.