Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288579›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative performance of the ahmed and vertucci systems in classifying mandibular premolar canal morphology: a Bayesian and information-theoretic analysis.

Fatma Pertek Hatipoglu, Güldane Magat, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Glynn Dale Buchanan, Indira Tulegenova, Nessrin Taha, Rafael Fernández-Grisales, Olga Bekjanova, Mehdi Rahimi, David Donnermeyer and 13 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Fatma Pertek HatipogluDepartment of Endodontics, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
Güldane MagatDepartment of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Mohmed Isaqali KarobariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600077, India. dr.isaq@gmail.com.
Glynn Dale BuchananDepartment of Odontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Indira TulegenovaSchool of Dentistry, Kazakh National Medical University, , Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Nessrin TahaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Rafael Fernández-GrisalesDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, CES University, Medellín, Colombia.
Olga BekjanovaDepartment of Faculty Therapeutic Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University., Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Mehdi RahimiFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Dental School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
David DonnermeyerDepartment of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Ahmed A MadfaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen.
Xenos PetridisDepartment of Endodontics, Section of Dental Pathology and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Martha Gallegos IntriagoEndodontic Department of Dentistry, Universidad Central del Ecuador Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Surendar SugumaranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600077, India.
Safaa AllawiDepartment of Endodontic and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Anja IvicaUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Wen Yi LimDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Abdelrahman HamoudaDepartment of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Rohan JagtapDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences,, University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Dentistry, Jackson, USA.
Anna Paulina LehmannDepartment of Conservative Dentisty and Endodontics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
José Martín-CrucesEndodontics and Restorative Dentistry Unit, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Paulo J PalmaCenter for Innovation and Research in Oral Sciences (CIROS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Ömer HatipoğluDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multinational cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study evaluated the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars (M1Ps) from 21 countries and compared how well the Ahmed and Vertucci classification systems represented these patterns. A total of bilateral mandibular first premolars from eligible CBCT scans were assessed using both systems, and the data were analyzed with a hierarchical probabilistic approach to account for population and imaging-related variation. Across the overall dataset, a simple single-canal configuration was the dominant pattern, and this remained the most common finding in all populations despite limited but structured variation in less frequent subclasses. The Ahmed system classified all observed configurations, whereas the Vertucci system left approximately 10.2% of cases without an equivalent category. In addition, Ahmed preserved more anatomical detail, while Vertucci compressed several distinct configurations into broader groups. Demographic and imaging-related factors had modest effects, with voxel size showing the clearest technical influence on the detection of more complex patterns. Overall, M1P morphology showed a stable global pattern with secondary heterogeneity, and the Ahmed system provided a more complete and informative representation for CBCT-based morphology assessment across diverse populations.

Indexed as

BicuspidMandibleMandibular CanalBayes TheoremCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansAhmed classificationBayesian mixed-effects modelingInformation theoryMandibular first premolarRoot canal morphologyVertucci classification

Identifiers

PMID42288579
PMCPMC13521930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.