Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288577›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Exploring hemodynamic measurements from the Tromsø Study for prediction of cardiovascular disease using traditional statistical models and machine learning approaches.

Naomi Azulay, Bjørn-Jostein Singstad, Henrik Schirmer, Maja-Lisa Løchen, Roy Bjørkholt Olsen, Trond Geir Jenssen, Audun Stubhaug, Christopher Sivert Nielsen, Leiv Arne Rosseland, Christian Tronstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Naomi AzulayDepartment of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. naomin.azulay@gmail.com.
Bjørn-Jostein SingstadInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik SchirmerInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maja-Lisa LøchenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Roy Bjørkholt OlsenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sørlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway.
Trond Geir JenssenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Audun StubhaugInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christopher Sivert NielsenDepartment of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Leiv Arne RosselandDepartment of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Christian TronstadDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Engineering, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 848099Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2413Norges Forskningsråd 177725Norwegian Health Association 29038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Norway, NORRISK2 is the government-recommended risk model for predicting an individual's 10-year probability of getting cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aims to investigate the potential for improvement of CVD prediction by using hemodynamic measurements from a non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure monitor, taken as part of pain sensitivity assessment with the cold-pressor test (CPT) during the Tromsø6 Study (2007-2008). Using 6694 recordings, ultra-short-term pulse rate variability (PRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) obtained during the CPT were added as additional variables into the existing NORRISK2 survival model (extended model). In addition, the time-series data was used in a machine learning (ML) model without the NORRISK2 background variables. Both models were compared to a recalibration of the original NORRISK2 model. The predictions from the recalibrated NORRISK2 model and the ML model were then combined with logistic regression. The statistical models performed similarly on the test set, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), 0.79 (0.71-0.85) and 0.77 (0.69-0.84) (original, recalibrated and extended NORRISK2, respectively). The ML model using only hemodynamic measurements obtained a test set AUROC of 0.73 (0.67-0.80). Combining the NORRISK2 and ML model did not increase the AUROC. Adding ultra-short-term PRV and BRS derived from Tromsø6 did not improve the prediction of the NORRISK2 model either. Although with lower accuracy, the beat-to-beat time series of hemodynamic variables from a CPT had a significant (p < 0.01) ability to predict future CVD without any other person-specific data.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHemodynamicsMachine LearningModels, StatisticalBaroreflexBlood PressureFemaleHeart RateHumansNorwayPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID42288577
PMCPMC13521920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.