ArticleScientific reports2026
Automatic pain assessment from facial action units in ICU patients via various machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pain represents a critical vital sign monitored in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The facial action coding system (FACS) defines facial action units (AUs) and provides a structured framework for pain recognition. Currently, the most broadly used pain assessment method is the pain intensity scale developed by Prkachin and Solomon (PSPI), which relies on predefined AUs to quantify facial expressions. However, due to the influence of underlying diseases and facial texture variations in ICU patients, AUs can fail to transfer to clinical settings accurately. To address this problem, this study uses video sequences of pain states collected from 61 ICU patients under resting, daily, and procedural conditions by using an advanced AU detection system. By evaluating the AUs with statistical features and various classification models, this study identifies six key AUs that outperform the PSPI's predefined AUs in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. Further, this study explores the performance of various temporal self-learning networks in the pain assessment task, thus further validating the effectiveness of the identified AU combination. The results presented in this study demonstrate that using AU dynamic learning in combination with deep temporal analysis can improve the reliability of clinical pain assessment. Finally, this study offers a promising approach for automated pain monitoring systems in ICU settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.