Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288565›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhanced multi-attribute decision-making method to analyze renewable energy sources for sustainable transportation by synergizing the cubic set with picture fuzzy hypersoft sets.

Muhammad Sajid, Khuram Ali Khan, Atiqe Ur Rahman, Rostin Matendo Mabela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad SajidDepartment of Mathematics, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Khuram Ali KhanDepartment of Mathematics, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Atiqe Ur RahmanDepartment of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Rostin Matendo MabelaDepartment of Maths and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. rostin.mabela@unikin.ac.cd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to increasing environmental degradation, urban air pollution, and energy instability, the Government of Pakistan is focusing on transitioning to cleaner and more sustainable transportation options. While biofuels have often been seen as a partial substitute, their long-term environmental and economic sustainability is limited. Problems such as land use conflicts, food security concerns, and minimal carbon reduction highlight the need for a systematic shift to renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and hydropower. These alternatives offer greater sustainability, lower carbon footprints, and support Pakistan's national climate goals and energy diversification strategies. This research introduces a new approach to decision-making on green energy options using cubic picture fuzzy hypersoft sets (CPFHSSs), which effectively manage the ambiguity and complexity involved in the evaluation process. The decision-making method applies OR and AND operations of the CPFHSSs to combine expert judgments across multiple criteria, considering both optimistic and pessimistic perspectives in the final evaluation. The methodology is demonstrated through a case study based on recent official guidance to identify and rank the most suitable renewable energy sources for sustainable transportation in Pakistan.

Indexed as

Aggregation operationsComputational intelligenceMulti-attribute decision-makingRenewable energySustainable transportation

Identifiers

PMID42288565
PMCPMC13522617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.