ArticleScientific reports2026
Hard-object feeding adaptations infer relative predator-prey size relationships in Devonian placoderms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Devonian placoderms exhibit exceptional diversity in jaw and dental morphology, making them an ideal system for examining early gnathostome feeding mechanisms. Here, we investigate inferognathal (mandible) function in eight eubrachythoracid arthrodire placoderms from Australia's Late Devonian Gogo Formation. A combination of finite element analysis and quantification of dental surface complexity revealed distinct, size-dependent strategies for processing mechanically resistant materials (durophagy). Taxa with broad, flat dental surfaces experienced low strain during simulated bites, consistent with crushing armoured prey that could be engulfed whole. In contrast, the jaw of the largest taxon combined exceptional structural strength with highly complex, reinforced dentition, enabling force concentration to pierce through armour or shell, and tear apart prey items exceeding its oral capacity. Taxa of intermediate size exhibited higher strain and specialised slicing dentition, consistent with generalist diets or feeding strategies focused on shearing through softer tissues. Consumption of armoured prey in placoderms was therefore governed not by predator size alone, but by the relative size of prey to predator. Hard object feeding in arthrodire placoderms was not a result of a single mechanical solution, but involved several distinct solutions influenced by body size and prey-processing constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.