ArticleScientific reports2026
EEG blink and gaze control using random forest classification for accessible assistive robotic navigation in real world conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface for intuitive robotic navigation driven by ocular activity. A real multi-subject dataset collected from 15 participants was used to extract blink- and gaze related EEG features for five control commands. Eight supervised classifiers were evaluated under stratified 5-fold cross-validation: Random Forest, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, RUSBoost, Naive Bayes, decision tree, and linear discriminant analysis. Among them, Random Forest achieved the best overall performance, reaching 98.74 ± 1.19% accuracy, 0.9874 Macro-F1, and 0.9993 macro-AUC, demonstrating excellent robustness and class separability across the five ocular classes. The decoded commands were transmitted wirelessly to an embedded Raspberry Pi platform, where they were converted into safe motor actions for wheelchair type robot navigation. Real world experiments in indoor environments confirmed stable motion control, reliable command execution, and successful obstacle avoidance without physical interaction from the user. These findings support the feasibility of a low-cost, portable, and non-invasive BCI solution based on realistic multi-subject EEG data for assistive mobility applications. Although the full control loop operated online, the end-to-end system latency was not quantitatively benchmarked in the present study and remains an important limitation to be addressed in future work. Future developments will focus on expanding the command set, improving robustness under more variable conditions, and validating the system in broader assistive mobility scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.