ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of a recombinant single-cycle influenza viral vector as an intranasal vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the detrimental potential of zoonotic coronavirus transmission to human populations. Effective vaccines capable of eliciting immunity to SARS-CoV-2 have been pivotal in mitigating the spread of the virus. In this study, we describe the generation of a non-replicating pseudotyped influenza A virus (S-FLU), where the native haemagglutinin (HA) sequence is replaced with the coding sequence of either a membrane-anchored form (TM) or secretory form (Sec) of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan (S-RBD Wuhan). We showed that both S-RBD-TM and S-RBD-Sec viruses can be generated via reverse genetics and grown to high titre. Intranasal immunisation in mice with S-RBD-TM elicits robust serum binding and neutralisation activity against SARS-CoV-2, superior to S-RBD-Sec. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a heterologous prime-boost immunisation regimen in mice with S-RBD-TM Wuhan and S-RBD-TM BM48-31 (a distant Clade 3 SARS-like betacoronavirus (sarbecovirus)) increases antibody binding breadth against mismatched sarbecoviruses compared to homologous prime-boost with S-RBD-TM Wuhan, although this did not translate into significantly enhanced cross-neutralisation across the tested virus panel. These results demonstrate that S-RBD delivery via the intranasal route induces both systemic and mucosal antibody responses and provide a foundation for further optimisation of S-RBD sarbecovirus vaccine strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.