Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288502›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Individual threat-relevance accelerates belief-updating in conditioned hallucinations.

Joshua M Martin, Victoria L Fisher, Anna-Lena Eckert, Albert Powers, Philipp Sterzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua M MartinBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Faculty of Philosophy, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. joshua.martin@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6761-4045
Victoria L FisherYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Anna-Lena EckertDepartment of Psychology, Theoretical Cognitive Science Group, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Albert PowersYale University School of Medicine and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Philipp SterzerDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Threat-related learning is implicated in psychopathological hallucinations; however, its role in experimentally-induced hallucinations remains unclear. Here, we investigated how threat-relevant stimuli (spiders vs. flowers) influence conditioned hallucinations (i.e., illusory auditory tones triggered by learned associations with images). We found that, for conditioning with spiders (but not flowers), higher spider-phobia was related to time-dependent variations in conditioned hallucinations: increasing in early phases (where spiders reliably predicted tones) and decreasing in later phases (as this predictive relationship weakened). These tendencies were related to accelerated belief-updating in a hierarchical Gaussian filter model and shifts in participants' internal criterion within a signal detection framework. Additionally, trait anxiety and hallucination-proneness were inversely related to conditioned hallucinations and reliance on prior beliefs, but did not significantly vary according to image condition. Unlike the theorized role of threat in developing rigid priors and clinical hallucinations, our findings indicate that individual threat-relevance sensitises hallucination-related beliefs to shifting stimulus contingencies.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalFearHallucinationsAdultAnimalsAnxietyConditioning, ClassicalFemaleHumansMaleSpidersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42288502
PMCPMC13294484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.