ArticleClinical oral implants research2026
Effect of Implant Design on Fracture Resistance, Mode, and Crystal Structure of One- and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants With Ceramic or Titanium Abutment Screws: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the fracture resistance, fracture modes, and crystalline phase changes of zirconia one-piece implants (OPI) and bone-level (BLTPI) or tissue-level, two-piece implants (TLTPI), with ceramic (C) or titanium (T) abutment screws after dynamic preloading in a moist environment. MATERIALS AND
methodsDynamic preloading under moist conditions and subsequent static load-to-fracture testing were performed to evaluate fracture resistance and fracture mode. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of fracture surfaces was employed to supplement the observations of macroscopic fracture modes. Crystalline phase changes were assessed using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Specimen preparations were performed in accordance with ISO 14801:2016. Five different ceramic (zirconia) implant designs were divided into the following groups: OPI, BLTPI (BLC, BLT), TLTPI (TLC, TLT). One-way and two-way ANOVA tests were used for comparisons and factor effect analysis.
resultsFracture resistance (N) and bending moment (N cm) differed significantly among the implant groups (p < 0.001), following the order TLTPI (775.2 ± 71 N) > OPI (605.7 ± 37 N) > BLTPI (498.3 ± 93 N). Within the two-piece implants (TPI), tissue-level designs (TL) outperformed bone-level designs (BL), while designs with different abutment screw materials showed no significant difference (p = 0.982).
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this in vitro study, the evaluated zirconia-based OPI, BLTPI, and TLTPI systems demonstrate sufficient fracture resistance to support further clinical investigation. Implant-level design (TL vs. BL) influences mechanical performance, whereas the influence of abutment screw material (ceramic vs. titanium) is less pronounced and varies according to the implant-level design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.