ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Hazards associated with superconducting magnet quench events: system requirements, application and consequences.
Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The magnetically induced displacement force on nearby ferromagnetic objects has injured and killed people. The "quench" button dissipates the magnetic field by forcing the wire from the superconducting to the resistive state and its use in such situations should be unquestioned. Unfortunately, recent events demonstrate a reluctance to initiate a quench, perhaps because of the expense and down-time involved and the shock of confronting a rare and dire situation. Reports from various adverse incidents involving quenches also suggest a need to improve the awareness of what might happen during a quench. This review highlights relevant attributes of superconducting magnets (e.g. possible reasons for a quench, field attributes during the quench, various failure mechanisms that may occur etc.), the quench button, quench pipe, cryogen safety, and the quench sequence of events. Furthermore, it is necessary to be prepared for a rare gaseous helium release, including a nearby second safety-trained assistant, as people have been injured, incapacitated, or killed either by physical contact with a super-cooled object, hypoxia, or asphyxiation. In this regard, the development of "cryogenless" magnets demonstrates significant safety benefits. A selection of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience" (MAUDE) incident reports illustrate these various situations, and device recalls also identify and resolve various potential, or realized, hazards, such as magnet explosions due to over-pressure and accidental cryogen release mechanisms. All users of MRI equipment must recognize when it is necessary to initiate a quench, what happens when a quench goes awry, and be prepared with quick decisions and actions. However, with small ferromagnetic objects or other non-critical situations, there may be alternative non-quench solutions. Understanding prior incidents prepares us for what might happen in a future incident and is a motivation for additional safety procedure development and training activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.