Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287582›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026

A University-Military Partnership to Establish a Quality Assurance and Training System to Sustain the FAIR System for Determining Incidents of Family Maltreatment in the US Army.

Alison L Drew, Amy M Smith Slep, Natalia Lapshina, Kimberly A Rhoades, Brandon Neglio, Cynthia J Taylor, Danielle M Mitnick, Richard E Heyman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison L DrewNew York University, New York City, NY, USA. ad5938@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-1269
Amy M Smith SlepNew York University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6321-1740
Natalia LapshinaNew York University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-7162
Kimberly A RhoadesNew York University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-7602
Brandon NeglioNew York University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9813-0246
Cynthia J TaylorU.S. Army Installation Command Family Advocacy Program, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Danielle M MitnickNew York University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4958-2788
Richard E HeymanNew York University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5365-0037

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture 2021-48581-35661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congress mandates that each military service maintain a central registry to monitor the frequency of maltreatment incidents by service and installation across time. For over two decades, the Family Translational Research Group (FTRG; Co-directors: Amy Slep and Richard Heyman) at New York University has partnered with military Family Advocacy Programs (FAPs) to ensure that partner and child maltreatment determinations are fair and consistent. This collaboration resulted in the Field-Tested Assessment, Intervention-Planning, and Response (FAIR) system-an evidence-based practice mandated across all services for determining whether alleged incidents of partner and child abuse or neglect meet criteria as maltreatment. The US Army was the first service to require annual quality assurance (QA) to support FAIR sustainment. This paper will describe (a) FAIR and the evidence supporting its use, (b) the university-military partnership that supported FAIR dissemination in the US Army, and (c) the university-military partnership that established a QA and training system for FAIR sustainment in the US Army. In addition, the manuscript will provide empirical evidence demonstrating that FAIR implementation fidelity and the accuracy of determinations have improved across the first 2 years of QA. Challenges have included perceptions from local committees that FAIR QA is university-driven rather than FAP-owned, maintaining consistent standards, and adapting to policy changes. Collaborative decision-making, a focus on impact, and decades of immersion in military culture have supported this long-term university-government partnership.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practiceMilitary familiesPartner and child abuseQuality assuranceUniversity-government partnership

Identifiers

PMID42287582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.