Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287562›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cognitive function and upper limb motor function in people with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Nga Huen Chan, Shamay S M Ng

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05615610 (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Chronic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05615610 narecruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Chronic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsChronic StrokeArmstSCS, tVNS, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nga Huen ChanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-8125
Shamay S M NgDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China. Shamay.Ng@polyu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1660-0548

Funding

Research Centre for Chinese Medicine Innovation of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University P0041139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, including transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), is potential interventions that can alleviate cognitive decline and promote motor recovery by modulating neurotransmitter systems, but current evidence in people with stroke remains inconclusive. This study investigated the effects of tVNS and tSCS and compared their efficacy in improving cognitive function and upper limb motor function after stroke. In this randomized controlled trial, 90 people with chronic stroke (mean ± standard deviation: 65.12 ± 5.85 years of age) were randomly assigned to receive 18 sessions of either tVNS, tSCS, or sham stimulation, each delivered concurrently with upper limb exercises for 45 min, three times per week, for 6 weeks. The primary outcomes were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMAUE). Outcomes were measured at baseline, after 9 and 18 sessions, and at 1 month after the intervention. The tVNS and tSCS groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements than did the sham group in MoCA (mean differences, 2.37 and 1.77, respectively; p < 0.001) and FMAUE scores (mean differences, 3.37 and 2.10, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively) after the intervention. Improvements in cognition persisted for 1 month in both groups, as indicated by non-significant within-group changes from post-intervention to follow-up assessments, whereas motor improvements were sustained only in the tVNS group. Both tVNS and tSCS may be potential interventions to combine with exercise for improving cognitive and upper limb function after stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05615610.

Indexed as

CognitionStrokeTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulationTranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulationUpper limb function

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.