ArticleGeroScience2026
Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cognitive function and upper limb motor function in people with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05615610 (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Chronic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Chronic Stroke
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, including transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), is potential interventions that can alleviate cognitive decline and promote motor recovery by modulating neurotransmitter systems, but current evidence in people with stroke remains inconclusive. This study investigated the effects of tVNS and tSCS and compared their efficacy in improving cognitive function and upper limb motor function after stroke. In this randomized controlled trial, 90 people with chronic stroke (mean ± standard deviation: 65.12 ± 5.85 years of age) were randomly assigned to receive 18 sessions of either tVNS, tSCS, or sham stimulation, each delivered concurrently with upper limb exercises for 45 min, three times per week, for 6 weeks. The primary outcomes were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMAUE). Outcomes were measured at baseline, after 9 and 18 sessions, and at 1 month after the intervention. The tVNS and tSCS groups demonstrated significantly greater improvements than did the sham group in MoCA (mean differences, 2.37 and 1.77, respectively; p < 0.001) and FMAUE scores (mean differences, 3.37 and 2.10, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively) after the intervention. Improvements in cognition persisted for 1 month in both groups, as indicated by non-significant within-group changes from post-intervention to follow-up assessments, whereas motor improvements were sustained only in the tVNS group. Both tVNS and tSCS may be potential interventions to combine with exercise for improving cognitive and upper limb function after stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05615610.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.