ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
3D-printed peek exo-endoprosthesis for limb salvage in dogs and cats.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exo-endoprostheses are gradually gaining popularity in veterinary medicine. This study reports the clinical evolution of four patients -one feline and three canines- treated with a novel exo-endoprosthesis system. In all cases, distal limb amputation was performed due to various pathologies -type IIB open fracture, grade 1 chondrosarcoma, ectrodactyly and traumatic partial amputation-, followed by implantation of a custom-designed endomedullary component inserted into the residual bone during same surgical procedure. The interval before exoprosthesis attachment ranged from 2 to 5 months postoperatively, depending on patient-specific factors such as epithelial down-growth or external limitations. Different exoprosthesis designs and versions were developed and 3D-printed according to anatomical region of amputation. Surgical technique, postoperative outcome, limb function, and radiographic findings were described for each case. Upon initial attachment, all animals readily accepted exoprosthesis, with no instances of implant failure or fracture during use. Osseous growth with this inner part was consistent and robust across cases. Surgeries were free of intraoperative complications and postoperative pain. However, long-term use was limited by instability at exo-endoprosthesis interface, which prevented consistent weight-bearing and definitive prosthesis adoption. Postoperative complications included excessive skin overgrowth in patients 2 and 4, and delayed healing in patient 3. Key issues were suboptimal postoperative care and delays in iterative exoprosthesis adjustments. Clinical progress of this system was discussed and compared with analogous designs in human medicine. Internal part implantation of exo-endoprosthesis to distal limb of small animals is feasible and can result in favourable functional outcomes if dermal integration issue can be adequately addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.