ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Unstable or Stable? Prosodic Features and Voice Quality in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSpeech prosody is fundamental to human spoken communication, and it is frequently characterized by atypical patterns, alongside voice quality, in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, findings across studies regarding these acoustic features in ASD remain inconsistent.
methodsLiterature searches across four databases identified eligible studies comparing prosodic or voice quality acoustic parameters between individuals with ASD and matched TD individuals. A total of 40 studies involving 1023 individuals with ASD and 929 TD individuals were included. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to assess potential moderators.
resultsThe meta-analyses revealed a significantly higher mean pitch (Hedges' g = 0.43), broader pitch range (g = 0.29), and higher pitch standard deviation (g = 0.22) in the ASD group. For voice quality, significantly reduced shimmer (g = -0.44) and a trend toward reduced jitter (g = -0.26) indicated heightened stability of vocal fold vibrations in ASD.
conclusionOur findings reveal a seemingly paradoxical acoustic profile in ASD: while individuals with ASD exhibit suprasegmental instability, they also demonstrate voicing hyper-stability. Moderators identified after subgroup and meta-regression analyses, including language background, IQ status, age span, mean age, and task type, may further moderate the prosodic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.