ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Cardiac function and myocardial strain analysis at 7T using B1 shimming in comparison to 3T magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to spatial heterogeneities of transmit B1 magnitude, cardiac MRI at 7 Tesla is still far from being clinically established. Different strategies were proposed to mitigate signal variations that may lead to a significant increase of the examination time. The aim of this study was to establish an efficient workflow for B1 shimming for cine imaging at 7T with a single B1 shim set and the investigation of the impact of field strength on volumetric and strain parameters Long- and short-axis images were acquired in ten volunteers at 3T and 7T. At 7T, B1 maps were acquired to calculate a single B1 phases him vector that was applied for the entire exam. Image quality reading was performed by two radiologists. Biventricular volumetric parameters were assessed by two readers. Biventricular function was further assessed for peak strain using feature tracking Image quality and contrast of long-axis images acquired at 7T was inferior compared to 3T, although all images were deemed to bediagnostically usable. In comparison to 3T, 7T slightly underestimated left ventricular volumes, with differences remaining under 10%of absolute values and thus of minimal clinical relevance. Strain parameters were not impacted by field strength A single B1 shim set provides excitation patterns without substantial signal dropouts in the heart. Moderate residual B1 variations and the reduced myocardium-blood contrast at 7T hindered neither quantification nor diagnostic quality. In conclusion, an efficient workflow could be realized at 7T for cardiac cine imaging for function and strain analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.