ReviewBlood research2026
Novel treatment strategies in acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Blood research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a molecularly diverse hematologic malignancy, with clinical outcomes driven by patient fitness, disease biology, and the depth of remission. Over the past decade, the increasing use of molecular studies has enabled genotype-directed therapy and accelerated the incorporation of targeted agents into both intensive and lower-intensity treatment regimens. FLT3 inhibitors are now well established across a wide disease spectrum, including frontline settings, relapsed/refractory disease, and post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation maintenance, with emerging evidence supporting measurable residual disease (MRD)-adapted maintenance approaches. IDH1/2 inhibitors offer therapy for specific molecular subsets, particularly in older or unfit patients, and are increasingly being evaluated in doublet and triplet combinations. Venetoclax-based regimens have become a cornerstone for older or unfit patients with AML and are being optimized through response-adapted dosing and careful partner selection to mitigate cytopenias while deepening remission. Menin inhibitors represent a major therapeutic advance for KMT2A-rearranged and NPM1-mutated AML and are rapidly moving into combination and earlier-line treatment strategies. In parallel, immune and cellular therapies, including antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint modulation, bispecific engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and chimeric antigen receptor natural killer constructs, are under investigation, although durable, practice-changing benefits outside select settings remain limited to date. This review synthesizes pivotal clinical data and translational principles informing emerging targeted, immune-based, and cellular strategies in AML, with an emphasis on remission depth, MRD-driven decision-making, and relapse prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.