ArticleHealth & justice2026
The public health impacts of drug-induced homicide laws: a community-engaged scoping review.
Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug-induced homicide (DIH) laws are state laws that confer criminal liability equivalent to homicide for the sale or delivery of drugs subsequently associated with a fatal overdose.
methodsWe undertook a scoping review of literature on the public health impacts of DIH laws and held focus groups to seek guidance on the interpretation of review results from three directly-impacted community groups: public health and harm reduction professionals; people who use drugs (PWUD); and family members of adult victims of fatal overdose.
resultsEight publications met our inclusion criteria. Three of those publications presented the results of a systematic analysis of DIH laws and/or their effects; the remaining five publication presented exploratory results related to these topics. Six of the eight publications suggest that DIH laws actively deter people from calling 911 to report an overdose. Two publications suggest that DIH laws have small but disruptive impacts on drug market participation. One publication suggests that friends and family of overdose victims constitute about half of all people charged under DIH laws and the conclusion that DIH charges are overwhelmingly brought in response to the death of a white person. Public health and harm reduction professionals and PWUD reported, generally, that these conclusions align with their lived experience and prior understandings of DIH laws. Family members rejected the evidence that DIH laws deter calling 911, asserting that such a relationship makes no sense, often relying on stereotyped understandings of substance use to support that claim. Public health and harm reduction professionals advocated for additional research documenting the negative impacts of DIH laws, with the goal of informing more effective drug policy. Family members advocated for more research on friends and loved ones affected by overdose.
conclusionsCurrent evidence on the impacts of DIH laws remains limited but consistently indicates negative consequences for public health. Additional research is needed, especially research that addresses the expressed needs and priorities of directly impacted community groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.