Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287458›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2026

Diagnostic performance of intraoperative urine dipstick testing during ureteroscopy: association with culture positivity and severe infection.

Carlos González González, Pietro Scilipoti, Federico Zorzi, Nicola Nannola, Marie Chicaud, Frédéric Panthier, Olivier Traxer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos González GonzálezEndolase Lab, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, GRC n°20-Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75020, France. dr.carlosgonzalezg@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1744-8913
Pietro ScilipotiEndolase Lab, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, GRC n°20-Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75020, France.
Federico ZorziEndolase Lab, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, GRC n°20-Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75020, France.
Nicola NannolaEndolase Lab, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, GRC n°20-Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75020, France.
Marie ChicaudEndolase Lab, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, GRC n°20-Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75020, France.
Frédéric PanthierEndolase Lab, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, GRC n°20-Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75020, France.
Olivier TraxerEndolase Lab, PIMM Lab Arts et Métiers ParisTech, GRC n°20-Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75020, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteroscopy (URS) is a widely performed procedure for urinary stone disease, yet infectious complications, including sepsis, remain a concern despite negative preoperative urine cultures. Intraoperative urine dipstick testing offers a rapid point-of-care assessment, but its diagnostic performance for predicting culture positivity and severe infection at different sampling sites during URS remains unclear. In this retrospective, single-center study, 238 patients undergoing URS were included. Paired urine dipstick and culture samples were obtained from bladder urine, intraoperative pelvic urine, and post-laser pelvic urine. Dipstick positivity was defined using two criteria: leukocytes and/or nitrites (OR definition) and leukocytes and nitrites (AND definition). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for predicting culture positivity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed, including a composite dipstick score (0-2). Severe postoperative infection was assessed as a secondary exploratory outcome. Culture positivity ranged from 18.4% (bladder) to 22.9% (intraoperative pelvic urine). Using the OR definition, pooled sensitivity was 80.5% and specificity 47.6%, whereas the AND definition yielded lower sensitivity (43.8%) and higher specificity (86.4%). Diagnostic performance varied by sampling site, with intraoperative pelvic urine demonstrating the most balanced metrics. ROC analysis showed moderate discriminative performance, with the highest AUC observed for pelvic urine sampled prior to laser fragmentation (AUC 0.723, 95% CI 0.646-0.801). For severe infection (4.2%), dipstick testing demonstrated low sensitivity (30%), and this analysis was considered exploratory. Intraoperative urine dipstick testing demonstrates moderate diagnostic performance for predicting culture positivity during URS, with results influenced by sampling site and positivity definition. Pre-laser pelvic sampling provides the most informative results. A negative intraoperative dipstick, particularly from pre-laser pelvic urine, may help identify patients at lower likelihood of culture positivity; however, the test remains insufficient to guide antimicrobial or postoperative decision-making in isolation. Further prospective studies are required to validate its role in perioperative risk stratification.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsUreteroscopyUrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareIntraoperative PeriodMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReagent StripsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityReagent StripsCulture positivityDiagnostic performancePostoperative infectionSensitivity and specificityUreteroscopyUrine dipstick

Identifiers

PMID42287458
PMCPMC13264553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.