ArticleArchives of women's mental health2026
Perinatal depression and breastfeeding: a longitudinal investigation of the bidirectional relationship in Pakistan.
Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe relationship between perinatal depression and breastfeeding is complicated and reciprocal. While breastfeeding may protect against postpartum depression, perinatal depression can also reduce the likelihood of breastfeeding. Using longitudinal data from Pakistan, we examine the effect of (1) breastfeeding on postpartum depression, stratified by prenatal depression and (2) perinatal depression on breastfeeding.
methodsData were drawn from the Bachpan study in Pakistan at five timepoints: pregnancy, delivery, 3-, 6-, and 12-months postpartum. Breastfeeding (any and exclusive [EBF]) was assessed using 24-hour recall; depression was measured with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID). Marginal structural models accounted for the time-varying relationship between depression and breastfeeding to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsAmong 1,014 postpartum individuals, weighted prevalence of any breastfeeding was 73.6% at delivery, 93.1% at 3-months, 86.1% at 6-months, and 73.0% at 12-months. EBF at 6-months was low (8.7%). Depression prevalence was 25.1% during the third trimester, 13.1% at 3-months, 10.8% at 6-months, and 15.7% at 12-months. Any breastfeeding was associated with a lower risk of postpartum depression (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.51-1.03), though the CI included the null. In turn, perinatal depression reduced the likelihood of any breastfeeding (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-0.99). EBF was similarly associated with a lower risk of postpartum depression (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.68-1.20), though the CI also included the null. When stratified by prenatal depression, point estimates suggest that EBF may have a stronger association with lower depression risk among those without prenatal depression compared to those with prenatal depression (RR: 0.77 vs. RR: 1.03), though both CIs included the null.
conclusionsResults support a complex bidirectional relationship between breastfeeding and perinatal depression, where depression reduces breastfeeding likelihood and any breastfeeding shows possible protective associations with depression, though the benefits of EBF may differ by prenatal depression status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.