Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287449›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2026

Host Species Mediate Distinct Seed Microbiome Responses to Restoration.

Allison A Mertin, Linda L Blackall, Douglas R Brumley, Edward C Y Liew, Marlien van der Merwe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison A MertinResearch Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Botanic Gardens of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. amertin@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-4026
Linda L BlackallSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-7698
Douglas R BrumleySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-0251
Edward C Y LiewResearch Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Botanic Gardens of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-5627
Marlien van der MerweResearch Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Botanic Gardens of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-5143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial diversity is a key driver of ecosystem function, yet it remains poorly integrated into ecological restoration frameworks. While seeds are the primary dispersal unit of plants and the foundation of most restoration programs, the microbial communities they carry are rarely considered. Here, we assess whether sites that have undergone restoration have altered seed-associated microbial communities. We do this by comparing bacterial and fungal seed microbiomes across natural and restored landscapes. Using a landscape-scale sampling design, seeds were collected from multiple plant host species and populations across 41 sites spanning a broad latitudinal gradient. High-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and ITS2 region was used to characterise bacterial and fungal communities, respectively, and differences in diversity, composition, and network structure were assessed using multivariate and network-based approaches. Seed microbiomes differed between natural and restored sites, but the magnitude and nature of these changes varied among host species. Restored sites were associated with shifts in microbial diversity, community composition, and network structure, including changes in the retention of putative keystone taxa. In some species, restoration was linked to pronounced restructuring of seed-associated microbial communities, whereas in others, microbiomes remained comparatively stable. Together, these results demonstrate that restoration can alter seed microbial communities in ways that are not consistently predicted by soil-focused restoration outcomes and that host identity mediates these responses. Incorporating seed microbiome data into restoration monitoring may therefore provide a complementary and previously overlooked indicator of restoration success, with implications for improving plant germination and health.

Indexed as

BacteriaFungiMicrobiotaPlantsSeedsBiodiversityEcosystemRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SMicrobial diversityPlant growth promotionRestorationSeed microbiomeSeeds

Identifiers

PMID42287449
PMCPMC13461671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.