ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Transitioning from child and adolescent psychiatry to follow-up care: a concept mapping study.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Youth with severe and enduring mental health problems often require follow-up care after treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP). In this study, follow-up care is defined as services beyond CAP, including basic mental health support, primary mental health care, and practical or parenting support delivered by community-based teams. However, transitions to such care are often fragmented, poorly coordinated, and experienced as abrupt. This study explores perspectives of CAP clinicians, follow-up care providers, parents, and youth to identify factors considered both important and feasible for improving care transitions. Using Group Concept Mapping (GCM), a participatory mixed-methods approach, participants (n = 55) generated, sorted, and rated statements perceived as important and feasible in transitions from CAP to follow-up care. Data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analysis and Go-Zone analysis. Participants generated 56 statements, thematically grouped into nine clusters: (1) Care coordination, (2) Integrated care networks, (3) Care organization, (4) Family-centered care, (5) Follow-up care, (6) Shared decision-making, (7) Handover, (8) Accessible services, and (9) Empowerment and recovery. The findings suggest that transitioning from CAP to follow-up care is multifaceted and requires more than a timely handover between care providers. Particularly, shared decision-making, recovery orientation, and family involvement emerged as central themes across clusters. Our study indicates that improving transitions may benefit from coordinated, relational, and tailored approaches that promote continuity and empower youth and families throughout the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.