Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287380›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Prediction of pedicle screw fixation strength under craniocaudal cyclic load: comparison of various models trained on quantitative CT based finite element analysis.

Chenyu Jiang, Jiahao Chen, Hanqiang Ouyang, Daole Hu, Yating Hao, Shuyu Dong, Guoguo Tang, Zimu Chen, Yifan Wang, Manling Wu and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chenyu JiangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. 529912229@qq.com.
Jiahao ChenInstitute of Intelligent Diagnostics, Beijing United-Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, Beijing, China.
Hanqiang OuyangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Daole HuPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Yating HaoPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Shuyu DongPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Guoguo TangPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Zimu ChenPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Yifan WangPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Manling WuPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Tong ZuoPeking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China.
Ning LangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liang JiangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhen QianInstitute of Intelligent Diagnostics, Beijing United-Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, Beijing, China.
Huishu YuanPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. huishuy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102638National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to predict FEA-derived screw fixation strength (FS-CL) under craniocaudal cyclic load using machine learning and deep learning, and to explore whether FS-CL can serve as a surrogate marker for pedicle screw loosening (PSL) risk.

methodA retrospective analysis was conducted on 618 screw trajectories data from preoperative of 112 patients. Various ML and DL models utilizing CT images and screw trajectory, were developed to predict screw FS-CL including multilayer perceptron (MLP) and dual-channel 3D ResNet-18 models. Model performance was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R²) on an external validation set of 126 trajectories. Additionally, we validated the clinical efficiency of the model for the risk assessment of PSL based on a case-control cohort of 62 patients.

resultThe MLP and 3D ResNet-18 models demonstrated reliable FS-CL predictions, with less time spent compared to the manual FEA. All DL and ML model that focused on region surrounding screw trajectory performed better. The ResNet-18 model achieved the highest predictive performance for screw FS-CL (MSE: 0.009, R²: 0.836) and highest prediction for PSL risk with an AUC value of 0.826. The MLP model also exhibited moderate performance, outperforming other ML models.

conclusionAI models proposed in this study can accurately predict FEA-derived FS-CL efficiently providing a supplementary tool for PSL risk evaluation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFinite element analysisOsteoporosisPediclePrediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.