ArticleRheumatology international2026
Clinical, serological, and hematological profiles according to age at diagnosis in primary Sjögren disease: a single-center cross-sectional study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary Sjögren disease (pSjD) is a systemic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical, serological, and hematological manifestations. Because symptom onset and diagnostic delay may be difficult to determine retrospectively, age at diagnosis may provide a pragmatic framework for describing clinical heterogeneity. This study compared clinical, serological, and hematological profiles across diagnosis-age groups in pSjD. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 258 patients with definite primary Sjögren disease fulfilling the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria after exclusion of cases with uncertain primary/secondary status. Patients were stratified according to age at diagnosis into young-adult (< 40 years, n = 54), middle-age (40-59 years, n = 137), and late (≥ 60 years, n = 67) groups. Demographic, clinical, serological, hematological, and composite inflammatory indices were compared. Logistic regression was used to evaluate exploratory sex-adjusted associations with pulmonary involvement. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the modest discriminative performance of RDW-SD for late versus young-adult diagnosis-age groups. Pulmonary involvement was observed in 2/54 (3.7%) young-adult, 7/137 (5.1%) middle-age, and 19/67 (28.4%) late diagnosis-age patients (p < 0.001). In exploratory sex-adjusted logistic regression, late diagnosis-age was associated with pulmonary involvement compared with young-adult diagnosis-age (OR 8.20, 95% CI 1.75-38.32), whereas middle-age diagnosis was not (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.26-6.83). Extraglandular involvement also differed across groups (31.5%, 16.8%, and 35.8%, respectively; p = 0.006). Corticosteroid exposure was more frequent in the late diagnosis-age group (7.4%, 18.2%, and 32.8%; p = 0.002), but was interpreted as a treatment variable rather than an intrinsic disease phenotype. CRP, neutrophil count, monocyte count, RDW-SD, NLR, SIRI, SII, and AISI differed across groups. RDW-SD showed only modest discriminatory ability for late versus young-adult diagnosis-age groups (AUC 0.645, 95% CI 0.538-0.746). Autoantibody profiles were broadly comparable, although anti- SSB/La positivity was more frequent in the young-adult group. In this single-center cohort, age at diagnosis was associated with differences in selected clinical and hematological characteristics in pSjD. Late diagnosis-age was associated with a higher frequency of clinically recognized pulmonary involvement; however, this finding should be interpreted cautiously because smoking data were incomplete, HRCT screening was not systematic, age-related comorbidities were more common in older patients, and reverse causality related to ILD workup cannot be excluded. RDW-SD should be considered an exploratory CBC-derived marker with modest performance rather than a clinically established biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.