ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Comparison of shoelace technique versus conventional secondary suturing for delayed closure of limited fasciotomy wounds.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a limb-threatening surgical emergency requiring prompt fasciotomy. However, closure of fasciotomy wounds remains challenging and may lead to prolonged healing, increased complications, and higher healthcare costs. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of the shoelace technique with conventional delayed secondary suturing for fasciotomy wound closure.
methodsA prospective comparative study was conducted over 18 months, including 60 patients undergoing fasciotomy for ACS. Patients were equally divided into two groups: shoelace technique (n = 30) and conventional delayed secondary suturing (n = 30). The shoelace group underwent gradual wound approximation with serial tightening every 48-72 h. Primary outcomes included time to wound closure, duration of hospital stay, and treatment cost. Secondary outcomes included postoperative wound complications and functional and cosmetic outcomes.
resultsThe median time to wound closure was significantly shorter in the shoelace group (8 days; IQR 7-9) compared to the conventional group (14 days; IQR 12-16) (p < 0.001). The shoelace technique was associated with reduced hospital stay and lower treatment costs. Additionally, fewer wound-related complications were observed, along with favorable functional and cosmetic outcomes.
conclusionThe shoelace technique is a safe and cost-effective method for fasciotomy wound closure, associated with faster wound closure and reduced hospital stay compared to conventional secondary suturing. It facilitates faster healing, reduces hospitalization, and lowers complication rates compared to conventional secondary suturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.