ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
A Pragmatic Intervention to Increase Screening of High-Risk Individuals for Diabetic Retinopathy.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness among U.S. working-age adults. Hispanic and Black individuals with diabetes are disproportionately impacted. Early detection of DR can prevent vision loss; however, at least 30% of patients at risk are not screened. Data were collected in a primary care clinic from September 2023 - August 2024. People with diabetes overdue for an eye exam were referred for photo screening during a primary care visit. Referrals, screening completion, interpretation of results, and follow-up eye visits were recorded in the electronic health record (EHR). After screening, individuals were asked to complete an experience survey. Of the 124 individuals referred during their primary care visit, 78% (n=97) completed the screening. Of those screened, 77% (n=75) resulted in interpretable findings. Of these 75 screened patients, 9% (n=7) detected severe (vision threatening) DR and 24% (n=18) detected mild to moderate DR. 24% completed the experience survey. 22 respondents (96%) reported that it was very easy to get their eyes screened. Half reported that they would not have scheduled a separate screening visit if it hadn't been offered as part of their visit. All respondents recommend the intervention. We detected significant eye findings, including vision threatening retinopathy among a population likely to not have been otherwise screened. Patients reported positive experiences and recommended this approach. That we accomplished this at a primary care clinic location with a higher percent of patients of color than our general patient population indicates a contribution to equitable diabetes outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.