Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287141›Full record

ReviewMolecular microbiology2026

To Move or Not to Move: When and How Bacteria Suppress Flagellar Motility.

Fatemeh Mohaghegh, Jacob Scadden, Matthew A B Baker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatemeh MohagheghSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jacob ScaddenSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Matthew A B BakerSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-6904

Funding

Australian Research Council DP240100462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial motility enables cells to migrate toward favourable environments and initiate surface colonisation. While motility can be lost through passive processes, such as shearing of filament, it frequently occurs as a tightly regulated response shaped by environmental and ecological conditions. Cessation of motility is often not only a passive consequence of environmental limitations but can also represent a tightly regulated and adaptive strategy that promotes bacterial survival, persistence and biofilm development. Stopping motility allows the bacterial cells to redirect energy and metabolic resources toward essential processes, including extracellular matrix production and stress tolerance. This transition facilitates niche adaptation through protective biofilm communities which enhance bacterial stability under environmental stressors such as nutrient limitation, antimicrobial agents and host immune defences. Collectively, motility cessation represents a regulated shift to protective and communal lifestyles, with implications for bacterial ecology and pathogenesis. Studies have shown that bacteria use diverse mechanisms and signals for flagellar suppression, highlighting the importance of motility regulation in bacterial adaptation to changing environments. In this review, we highlight various mechanisms governing motility cessation and discuss the functional and environmental reasons that suppress motility across bacterial species.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaFlagellaAdaptation, PhysiologicalBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsCyclic GMPGene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCyclic GMPbacterial motilitybiofilmcyclic‐di‐GMPflagellar motormotility cessationmotility regulation

Identifiers

PMID42287141
PMCPMC13432727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.