Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287075›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2026

Understanding Medicaid Estate Recovery: The Experience of North Carolina and Policy Implications for Future Reforms.

Amanda Spishak-Thomas, Emma Sandoe, Heather Howard

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda Spishak-ThomasCenter for State Health Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7396-261X
Emma SandoeOregon Health Authority, Salem, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5422-8877
Heather HowardSchool of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9471-3245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of Medicaid estate recovery in North Carolina. STUDY SETTING AND

designWe descriptively analyzed the number of estates, amount recovered, and hardship waiver applications using North Carolina public records data. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: The data contained information on the number of estates and amount recovered through Medicaid estate recovery between 2017 and 2021 (n = 2975). Additionally, we analyzed hardship waiver application data for residents who applied and had their application processed between 2018 and 2021 (n = 301). PRINCIPAL

findingsWe found approximately $83 billion was recovered from beneficiaries between 2017 and 2021, or 0.6% of the total cost of North Carolina's annual Medicaid program and just 0.9% of the fee-for-service annual long-term services and supports Medicaid budget. We found that Black homeowners were more likely to have lower value estates recovered, and overall, more money was recovered from white estates.

conclusionWhile states hope Medicaid estate recovery may balance Medicaid spending through increased revenue, our findings demonstrate that these efforts may be insufficient. Policymakers should opt for strategies outside of the Medicaid program that can more precisely target high-net-worth individuals instead of policies like estate recovery that disproportionately impact low-income families.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformHousingMedicaidHumansNorth CarolinaUnited Statesaginghomeownershiplong‐term caremedicaidracial disparities

Identifiers

PMID42287075
PMCPMC13263700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.