Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287040›Full record

ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2026

[Spatial accessibility and optimization of pediatric healthcare resources in Beijing].

Jiawei Zhang, Zheng Zhu, Chao Gong, Runzhi Han, Li Yang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiawei ZhangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zheng ZhuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Chao GongDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Runzhi HanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Li YangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the spatial accessibility of pediatric healthcare resources in Beijing and to develop an optimization model for resource allocation under a fixed additional resource constraint, with the aim of exploring optimal allocation strategies for 2025 and 2030.

methodsUsing communities as the unit of analysis, this study integrated data on Beijing ' s child population in 2020 and pediatric healthcare resources in 2022. An improved two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method was applied to measure spatial accessibility. Based on projected child population data for 2025 and 2030, an optimization model was constructed to minimize regional disparities in accessibility. Under the constraint of a fixed total number of additional resources, optimal spatial allocation schemes were derived and compared with a conventional population-based allocation approach.

resultsIn 2022, Beijing had 4 704 pediatric beds and 4 011 pediatric physicians. The mean spatial accessibility for pediatric beds and pediatric physicians was 1.17 and 0.97, respectively, with a standard deviation of 2.78 for bed accessibility, exhibiting a clear spatial pattern of higher accessibility in central districts and lower accessibility in suburban districts. In the same year, the number of pediatric physicians per 1 000 children in Beijing reached 1.52, already exceeding the targets for 2025 and 2030; therefore, no additional increase in total physician numbers was required. Under the 2025 optimization scenario, the mean accessibility of pediatric beds increased to 1.68, with the standard deviation declining to 2.45, indicating a reduction in regional disparities. Under the 2030 scenario, the mean accessibility further increased to 2. 31, with a standard deviation of 2.56, reflecting continued improvement in accessibility. The optimization model identified Daxing District, Tongzhou District, and Mentougou District as priority districts for additional bed allocation, whereas the conventional population-based approach allocated more resources to Daxing District, Haidian District, and Tongzhou District. While the two approaches showed general consistency in overall spatial allocation, the optimization model more effectively addressed inter-district disparities in accessibility.

conclusionSignificant spatial disparities were identified in the distribution of pediatric healthcare resources in Beijing. The accessibility-oriented optimization approach, under a fixed resource constraint, improved the alignment between supply and demand and reduced regional inequities. It served as a useful complement to conventional population-based allocation methods and provided quantitative evidence to support refined planning and dynamic adjustment of pediatric healthcare resources. Given that the total number of pediatric physicians has already met national targets, leveraging integrated medical consortium and multi-site practice policies to promote the mobility of qualified pediatric physicians toward underserved areas represents a promising pathway toward structural optimization of spatial resource distribution.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesHealth Care RationingHealth ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityPediatricsResource AllocationBeijingChildHumansOptimizationPediatric resourcesResource allocationSpatial accessibility

Identifiers

PMID42287040
PMCPMC13268833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.