ArticleSleep2026
Charting infant sleep cycle development using actigraphy: longitudinal evidence for ultradian cycle lengthening within the first year of life from 35 000 h of sleep.
Article in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep is marked by ultradian cycles coinciding with the alternation of rapid eye movement (REM) and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. These sleep cycles are a striking feature exhibited from infancy through adulthood, yet their underlying mechanisms and functional relevance remain elusive, calling for large-scale longitudinal studies. Here, we leverage Locomotor Inactivity During Sleep (LIDS), an accessible marker of sleep cycles in adults, to chart ultradian sleep cycle dynamics in infants at scale. Specifically, we analyzed $> \text{35\,000}$ h of sleep from a longitudinal dataset of $\text{152}$ infants with actigraphy at 3, 6, and 12 months of age. Using complementary signal processing techniques, we demonstrate the existence of rhythmic patterns in infant LIDS with cycle lengths of approximately $\text{60}$ min. Cycles were shorter in infants than parents (62 min 95%CI $[\text{56, 67}]$ vs. 81 min $[\text{74,\ 88}]$) and increased by approximately 10 min from $\text{3}$ to $\text{12}$ months, mirroring previous results in smaller samples for NREM-REM sleep cycles. This increase was partially mediated by increasing sleep bout duration ($\text{1.0}$ min/h $[\text{0.9, 1.2}]$). Longer cycles were also found in infants still breastfed at $\text{12}$ months ($\text{2.5}$ min $[\text{0.4, 4.5}]$) and their breastfeeding mothers ($\text{6.7}$ min $[\text{0.5, 12.9}]$). Furthermore, inactivity was lower at sleep onset, declined more rapidly and showed a greater amplitude in infants than parents, but all three parameters began to mature already within the first year. Overall, our results support a link between patterns in limb inactivity and sleep cycle physiology in infancy, underscoring the potential of studying these in large-scale cohorts for developmental and health outcomes. Statement of Significance Infancy is a time of profound change in sleep, spurring theories about underlying drivers, and links with developmental outcomes. Studying sleep repeatedly at this early age, however, is difficult, but wearables may help to overcome the data shortage. Here, we used easy-to-record limb movement from ankle actigraphs as a window into infant sleep physiology, going beyond its established use in sleep-wake monitoring. We demonstrate the presence of 60-min cycles in movement during sleep compatible with the pioneering discoveries of alternating rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep in infants. The gradual lengthening of these cycles in our large sample underscores previous evidence of NREM-REM cycle lengthening during infancy, paving the way for studies linking cycle dynamics with developmental trajectories in large birth cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.