Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286890›Full record

ArticleSleep2026

Charting infant sleep cycle development using actigraphy: longitudinal evidence for ultradian cycle lengthening within the first year of life from 35 000 h of sleep.

Grégory Hammad, Sarah F Schoch, Maximilian Engelmann, Zoe Spock, Salome Kurth, Eva C Winnebeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grégory HammadNeurogenetics, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-3869
Sarah F SchochRadboud University Medical Center, Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3962-5804
Maximilian EngelmannInstitute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Zoe SpockSection of Chronobiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4400-9061
Salome KurthDepartment of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Eva C WinnebeckNeurogenetics, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0717-9432

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 450622422Foundation for Research in Science and the Humanities STWF-17-008Olga Mayenfisch FoundationSwiss National Science Foundation P0ZHP1-178697Swiss National Science Foundation P5R5PS-230534Swiss National Science Foundation PCEFP1-181279University of Zurich FK-18-047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep is marked by ultradian cycles coinciding with the alternation of rapid eye movement (REM) and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. These sleep cycles are a striking feature exhibited from infancy through adulthood, yet their underlying mechanisms and functional relevance remain elusive, calling for large-scale longitudinal studies. Here, we leverage Locomotor Inactivity During Sleep (LIDS), an accessible marker of sleep cycles in adults, to chart ultradian sleep cycle dynamics in infants at scale. Specifically, we analyzed $> \text{35\,000}$ h of sleep from a longitudinal dataset of $\text{152}$ infants with actigraphy at 3, 6, and 12 months of age. Using complementary signal processing techniques, we demonstrate the existence of rhythmic patterns in infant LIDS with cycle lengths of approximately $\text{60}$ min. Cycles were shorter in infants than parents (62 min 95%CI $[\text{56, 67}]$ vs. 81 min $[\text{74,\ 88}]$) and increased by approximately 10 min from $\text{3}$ to $\text{12}$ months, mirroring previous results in smaller samples for NREM-REM sleep cycles. This increase was partially mediated by increasing sleep bout duration ($\text{1.0}$ min/h $[\text{0.9, 1.2}]$). Longer cycles were also found in infants still breastfed at $\text{12}$ months ($\text{2.5}$ min $[\text{0.4, 4.5}]$) and their breastfeeding mothers ($\text{6.7}$ min $[\text{0.5, 12.9}]$). Furthermore, inactivity was lower at sleep onset, declined more rapidly and showed a greater amplitude in infants than parents, but all three parameters began to mature already within the first year. Overall, our results support a link between patterns in limb inactivity and sleep cycle physiology in infancy, underscoring the potential of studying these in large-scale cohorts for developmental and health outcomes. Statement of Significance Infancy is a time of profound change in sleep, spurring theories about underlying drivers, and links with developmental outcomes. Studying sleep repeatedly at this early age, however, is difficult, but wearables may help to overcome the data shortage. Here, we used easy-to-record limb movement from ankle actigraphs as a window into infant sleep physiology, going beyond its established use in sleep-wake monitoring. We demonstrate the presence of 60-min cycles in movement during sleep compatible with the pioneering discoveries of alternating rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep in infants. The gradual lengthening of these cycles in our large sample underscores previous evidence of NREM-REM cycle lengthening during infancy, paving the way for studies linking cycle dynamics with developmental trajectories in large birth cohorts.

Indexed as

ActigraphySleepSleep StagesUltradian RhythmFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleactigraphybabyearly childhoodinfantlongitudinalNREM–REM cyclessleepsleep regulationultradianwearables

Identifiers

PMID42286890
PMCPMC13658273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.