Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286873›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026

Conduct and counter-conduct in everyday patient encounters: a foucauldian interpretation of nurses' lived experiences in forensic psychiatric inpatient care.

Lars Hammarström, Siri Andreassen Devik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lars HammarströmDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Siri Andreassen DevikFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Namsos, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5890-203X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examines forensic psychiatric inpatient care through a philosophical analysis of empirical findings from five lifeworld phenomenological studies, interpreted through Foucault's work. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll studies were conducted in forensic psychiatric settings from a nursing perspective. The findings were reanalyzed using phenomenological meaning analysis to develop a general structure in line with reflective lifeworld research principles.

findingsThe analysis identified three interrelated constitutive dimensions of nursing practice: (1) care practice as conduct and counter-conduct in the tension between institutional demands and patients' needs, (2) interpretive work as conduct and counter-conduct in responding to patients' expressions, and (3) emotional endurance as conduct and counter-conduct in resisting professional detachment. Together, these dimensions illustrate how care in forensic psychiatry is enacted within, rather than in opposition to, institutional power relations. The findings show how everyday encounters are shaped by a ward culture oriented towards safety, control, and predictability, while also giving rise to subtle, situated forms of counter-conduct. These practices open limited, fragile spaces for alternative care.

conclusionBy highlighting the interpretive, emotional, and moral labor involved in nursing practice, the study contributes a practice-based Foucauldian understanding of care in forensic psychiatric contexts.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelForensic NursingForensic PsychiatryInpatientsNurse-Patient RelationsPsychiatric NursingAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansEncountersforensic nursingFoucaultlived experiencenursingreflective lifeworld research

Identifiers

PMID42286873
PMCPMC13267035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.