ArticleMedical education online2026
Training climate matters: programmatic openness, individual belonging, and trainee mistreatment in graduate medical education.
Article in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical trainee mistreatment remains a widespread challenge in graduate medical education, contributing to burnout, depression, and workforce attrition. Graduate medical education programs have sought to create safer learning environments by fostering programmatic openness-climates perceived as transparent, welcoming, and supportive. Yet it remains unclear how such programmatic conditions interact with individual experiences of belonging to shape wellbeing. Drawing on ecological systems theory, we examine how programmatic openness and trainee belonging interact to mitigate trainee mistreatment during residency.
methodsWe conducted an anonymous online survey (Dec 2023-Jan 2024) at three large US teaching sites with 62 GME programs. Scales with robust validity evidence measured perceived programmatic openness, individual belonging, perceived mistreatment, burnout, and social support. We built a latent moderation model, encompassing both confirmatory factor analysis and latent interaction effects. We examined how programmatic openness moderated trainee perceived mistreatment while controlling for social support and trainee demographics.
resultsOf 675 eligible trainees, 266 responded (39.4%). Measurement models demonstrated good fit, supporting construct validity. Both programmatic openness and belonging were protective against perceived mistreatment, which was strongly associated with burnout. Residents' belonging to the training program was significantly associated with low burnout, even after accounting for social support. Moderation analyses revealed that programmatic openness most strongly buffered mistreatment among trainees who experienced low belonging, with diminished effects at higher belonging levels.
conclusionFindings revealed a compensatory effect, suggesting the beneficial effects of programmatic openness were especially crucial among trainees who experienced low individual belonging. This finding aligns with the ecological system theory, which posits that supportive environments may mitigate individual-level vulnerabilities. Both burnout and perceived mistreatment were at its lowest when programmatic openness and individual belonging were both present. This underscores the need for residency programs to foster both openness and belonging as core strategies to support trainee wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.