ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Unveiling Candidate Markers for Drug Resistance or Synthetic Lethality in Cervical Cancer: Integrative Analysis of Genetic and Pharmacoprofiling.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSystemic cervical cancer management continues to be challenging. Numerous chemotherapies have been approved, but predicting response is difficult due to the lack of biomarkers. Here, we analyze the genetic and protein profiles of 20 cervical cancer cell lines (CCCLs) and explore their correlation with drug response patterns to commonly used drugs, aiming to identify novel biomarkers of treatment response or resistance. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwenty cell lines (CLs) were characterized for HPV type, for genetic alterations, and protein expression profiles. Pharmacoprofiling in 10 selected CLs was carried out against 34 drugs used in the clinic, assessing drug concentrations needed to reach half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) in nanomolar and micromolar ranges. Subtractive bioinformatics analyses aimed to identify genetic alterations (609 genes of clinical interest), associated with CL drug resistance or on the contrary with synthetic lethality.
resultsDespite a small sample size, genetic alteration frequencies and types of CCCLs were in line with those in clinical samples, except for the detection of a higher frequencyin specific genetic alterations such as NBPF1 and STK11 in CLs. Pharmacological screening identified drugs exhibiting therapeutic activity in most CLs while others were highly selective. Bioinformatics analyses suggested, loss-of-function (LoF) alterations in PAPBC3 in CLs sensitive to microtubule interfering agentsin addition to 50 variably present alterations in the microtubule pathway. LoF alterations in CSMD3, OBSCN, ZNF 717, ALPK2, CLDND1, GTF3A, NLRP1, SI, and TRIM66 were associated with Epigenetic acting drug activity and LoF of OSBPL1A with Eprenetapopt (APR-246) activity. Drug synergistic effects were observed with certain drug combinations.
conclusionThis paper reports genetic variants in 20 CLs as well as the results of the assessment on whether those variants may help predict response or resistance to certain drug families. With a few exceptions, genetic alteration frequency in CCCLs, conducted in the same analytical batches, compares favorably with published patient data. Results need confirmation in independent larger studies both in CLs and in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.