Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286819›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2026

Temporal trends in colorectal resections for benign colorectal neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.

Sahil Sharma, Tyler McKechnie, Kelly Brennan, Olivia Kuszaj, Carolina Meyhofer Pedroso, Aristithes Doumouras, Sunil V Patel, Nalin Amin, Dennis Hong, Cagla Eskicioglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Declining surgery for benign colorectal neoplasia: Distinguishing temporal trends from endoscopic substitution.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sahil SharmaDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-014X
Tyler McKechnieDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-4096
Kelly BrennanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-2634
Olivia KuszajDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Carolina Meyhofer PedrosoDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2868-604X
Aristithes DoumourasDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sunil V PatelDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Nalin AminDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dennis HongDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Cagla EskiciogluDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-066X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes in North America have effectively reduced CRC incidence. Among the nearly six million colonoscopies performed annually in the United States, 4%-11% detect large benign colorectal neoplasms, many of which can be removed endoscopically, minimizing the need for surgery. Endoscopic removal is less invasive, preserves bowel function and lowers healthcare costs. Despite these benefits, segmental colectomy for benign neoplasia remains common, with surgeries increasing between 2000 and 2014. To address this, efforts have focused on improving access to advanced endoscopic care through training and collaboration initiatives, although their impact on surgery rates is unclear. This study aims to evaluate temporal trends in the surgical management of benign colorectal neoplasia using data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2016-2022 database.

methodsAdult patients undergoing elective colectomy and/or proctectomy for colorectal neoplasia between 2016 and 2022 were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database utilizing Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD 10) codes. Patients were then classified based on the nature of the pathology as either benign or malignant. The primary outcome was to determine the frequency of resections per year for benign neoplasia. The secondary outcomes included postoperative 30-day overall morbidity, system-specific complications and healthcare resource utilization for patients undergoing resections for benign neoplasia. Multivariable regression models were fit to identify variables associated with each secondary outcome.

resultsOverall, 207,250 patients underwent colectomy and/or proctectomy for colorectal neoplasia between 2016 and 2022. Among them, 35,108 (17.5%) had resection for benign neoplasia. The proportion of patients undergoing resection for benign neoplasia decreased yearly from 3458 (22.5%) in 2016 to 2396 (12.7%) in 2022. Most benign lesions were in the right colon (63.5%), removed during a colectomy with primary anastomosis (91.5%), using a minimally invasive approach (82.8%). The 30-day overall morbidity and mortality was 6.8% and 0.4%, respectively. There were 1114 (3.2%) patients who required a reoperation and 2798 (8.0%) who required a readmission following surgery for benign neoplasia. Patients who were American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 (odds ratio (OR) 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-3.10), active smokers (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.31-1.63) and those undergoing a proctectomy (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.93) all had increased odds of postoperative morbidity.

conclusionOur study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022 database demonstrated a temporal decrease in the proportion of elective colorectal resections for benign neoplasms every year, with associated low morbidity and mortality. Identification of patient and treatment factors associated with postoperative morbidity, such as ASA class, smoking and type of operative intervention, can help practitioners better counsel patients regarding different management strategies and effectively select patients for the approach most suitable for their presentation.

Indexed as

ColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsProctectomyAgedColonoscopyDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesbenign colorectal neoplasiaelective colectomy and proctectomyendoscopic resectionminimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID42286819
PMCPMC13263412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.