ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
Post-Meal Activity and Eating Disorder Behaviors: An Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Study.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-Meal Activity and Eating Disorder Behaviors: An Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Study.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMealtimes are associated with heightened distress among individuals with eating disorders (EDs) and are frequently accompanied by ritualized eating behaviors that maintain psychopathology. In inpatient settings, post-meal rest is commonly prescribed to prevent compensatory behaviors. Yet, enforced inactivity may exacerbate anxiety and ritual engagement. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine whether structured light post-meal activity is associated with a reduced likelihood of ritualized eating behaviors in an inpatient ED sample.
methodParticipants were 33 inpatients who completed a 2-week counterbalanced within-subject crossover protocol, consisting of 1 week of standard post-meal rest and 1 week allowing structured light post-meal activity. EMA prompts were delivered six times daily. Ritualized eating behaviors were assessed following reported eating episodes and coded dichotomously. A binomial generalized linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts for participants tested whether the likelihood of ritualized eating behaviors differed between conditions.
resultsParticipants completed 1503 EMA prompts (81.3% compliance). Across 1192 meal-related assessments, ritualized eating behaviors were reported in 30.8% of prompts during the rest condition and 24.2% during the post-meal activity condition, with substantial variability across individuals. Participants were significantly less likely to engage in ritualized eating behaviors during weeks allowing post-meal activity compared with rest-only weeks (B = -0.70, SE = 0.19, p = 0.0002), corresponding to an ~50% reduction in odds. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that supervised post-meal movement may help interrupt ritual engagement during a high-risk period and demonstrate the utility of EMA for examining behavioral mechanisms in inpatient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.