ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Implementing antipsychotic reduction in long-term care: interdisciplinary and lived-experience insights into system-level barriers and facilitators.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDespite the availability of evidence-based antipsychotic reduction strategies, implementation of these strategies in long-term care (LTC) often stalls. Understanding how change occurs in real-world practice requires perspectives from interdisciplinary team members. This study interviewed interdisciplinary team members, a family caregiver, and a person living with dementia in LTC in Vancouver, Canada, to explore how they operationalize antipsychotic reduction in LTC homes and examine their perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants: 18 interdisciplinary healthcare providers, one dementia advocate, and one family caregiver. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. To preserve inductive insights, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied post hoc to the emergent themes. We examined the extent to which the findings were aligned with the CFIR, thereby deepening the analysis.
resultsIdentified strategies included person-centered care planning, non-pharmacological interventions, medication review with behavior monitoring, and education. Barriers were: (1) challenging work environments, (2) safety concerns and unconscious dismissive attitudes, and (3) communication gaps. Facilitators included: (1) supportive leadership and frontline champions, (2) team communication, and (3) persistence. Each factor aligns with different CFIR constructs and domains to varying degrees. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The main contribution of this study is that, drawing on CFIR, it found barriers to antipsychotic reduction in LTC are not merely individual but also systemic. Sustained improvement depends on policies that enable and resource effective interdisciplinary teamwork. This includes adequate staffing, education, team communication, and culture change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.