ArticleAnimal microbiome2026
Metagenomic analysis reveals resistome characteristics and high-risk resistance genes in the pig nasal cavities, feces, and farm dust.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a threat to global public health. Swine farms are critical AMR reservoirs. Comprehensive resistome profiling and risk assessment across pig-associated niches remain limited. Metagenomic analysis of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in pig nasal cavities, feces, and farm dust was performed.
resultsNasal and dust samples exhibited significantly increased ARG diversity and abundance compared with feces. We identified 78 potentially hazardous ARGs and proposed an improved risk classification framework integrating host promiscuity, mobility, and human health risks. These ARGs were classified into four risk levels: 25 Level I (current high risk), 25 Level II (potential future threats), 18 Level III (host-promiscuous but nonmobile), and 10 Level IV (host-specific). High-risk ARGs mainly confer aminoglycoside, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS), and tetracycline resistance. Metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) analysis revealed that bacterial taxa enriched in ARGs were predominant in nasal and dust samples. Moreover, these environments presented higher mobile genetic element (MGE) abundance and similar ARG-MGE co-occurrence patterns. Notably, 74.12% of the mobile ARGs were predicted to be plasmid-borne, and these ARGs tended to be assigned higher health risk levels than chromosomal ARGs.
conclusionsThese findings provide a practical framework for ARG risk assessment and highlight the nasal cavity and dust as underappreciated but important AMR reservoirs in pig farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.