ArticleBMC psychology2026
Dynamic predictive modeling of basic psychological need satisfaction on subjective well-being among university students: examining the boundary conditions of self-determined motivation.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drawing on self-determination theory, this study develops a dynamic predictive framework to examine how basic psychological need satisfaction prospectively predicts subjective well-being among Chinese undergraduates and how self-determined motivation operates as a boundary condition. Five waves of panel data were collected from 547 students at four eastern Chinese universities across one academic year, with measurements spaced approximately ten weeks apart. Latent growth curve modeling combined with cross-lagged panel analysis revealed that need satisfaction at one wave reliably forecast subsequent well-being beyond autoregressive carryover, with autonomy exerting the strongest contemporaneous influence and relatedness contributing more enduring lagged effects. The interaction between lagged need satisfaction and the relative autonomy index was statistically reliable, and Johnson-Neyman analysis localized a non-significance interval of [-2.81, 1.93], outside which the predictive association held for roughly 71% of participants. Conditional slopes rose from 0.092 at low motivation to 0.418 at high motivation, suggesting that self-determined regulation statistically conditions, rather than uniformly amplifies, the need-well-being association. Robustness checks across alternative measures, estimators, and demographic strata supported the stability of these patterns. Because the design is observational, we read these patterns as temporally ordered associations rather than causal effects; traditional and random-intercept cross-lagged specifications, together with longitudinal measurement invariance tests, converged on the same qualitative picture. The findings add a dynamic, within-academic-year perspective to self-determination theory and inform mental health practice in Chinese higher education by suggesting that need-supportive interventions are most effective when paired with attention to motivational quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.