ArticleJournal of cannabis research2026
Gender identity and cannabis use in Canada and the United States: cross-sectional analysis of the International Cannabis Policy Study.
Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGender identity influences patterns of substance use; however, few population-level studies have included transgender and gender-diverse identities when examining patterns of cannabis use by gender identity.
methodsData are from the International Cannabis Policy Study's national, repeat cross-sectional surveys conducted annually between 2018-2023 in Canada and the United States. Weighted logistic and linear regression models examined differences by gender identity among 281 533 respondents aged 16-65 (including 2 445 transgender respondents and 783 with gender-diverse identities) for three primary outcomes: patterns of cannabis use, personal effects from cannabis, and comfort consuming cannabis across social settings.
resultsDaily consumption was reported by approximately 14% of cisgender men, transgender men, and people with gender-diverse identities, with less cisgender women (12%, OR = 0.74, CI95 = 0.72,0.77; p < .001) and transgender women (12%, OR = 0.76, CI95 = 0.59,1.00; p = .047) reporting daily consumption. Approximately 12% of cisgender men, transgender men, and transgender women reported being 'very addicted' to cannabis. Transgender women (6%, OR = 0.57, CI95 = 0.53,0.62; p < .001) and people with gender-diverse identities (6%, OR = 0.47, CI95 = 0.24,0.91; p = .025) were less likely to report being 'very addicted' compared to cisgender men. People with gender-diverse identities reported greater positive personal effects from cannabis compared to cisgender men (β=0.53, CI95 = 0.21,0.86, p = .001), with no differences between cisgender men, cisgender women, transgender men, and transgender women. Comfort consuming cannabis across social settings was lower among cisgender women than cisgender men (β=-0.21, CI95 = -0.23,-0.19; p < .001), with no differences between cisgender men, transgender men, and transgender women.
conclusionsFrequent and problematic patterns of cannabis use were more common among cisgender men, transgender men, and transgender women. These disparities warrant further consideration in both research and policy settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.