ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2026
Perceptions of challenges in clinical pediatric research: a survey of Italian pediatricians.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical research is essential for advancing pediatric care, yet pediatricians often face unique structural, organizational, and methodological barriers that may hinder their participation in scientific activities. Understanding these obstacles is crucial to designing effective strategies that strengthen pediatric research capacity in Italy, a country with a leading role in European pediatric output. This study aimed to investigate Italian pediatricians' perceptions of barriers, facilitators, and needs related to conducting research, applying evidence in clinical practice, and publishing scientific work.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey of Italian pediatricians using an 18-item questionnaire administered between April and May 2025. Data were analyzed descriptively, and multilevel logistic regression assessed associations between perceived barriers and respondents' characteristics.
resultsA total of 717 pediatricians involved in clinical and/or research activities were included. Among those engaged in research (n = 385), the most frequently reported personal barriers were difficulties balancing clinical and research duties (79.3%) and limited access to funding (67.9%). Operational issues such as delayed Ethics Committee approvals (80.8%) and challenges in multicenter data sharing (55.9%) were also prominent. Many respondents expressed dissatisfaction with current research evaluation systems: 78.2% believed that metrics should reflect long-term patient impact, and 73.1% reported that existing criteria penalize pediatric researchers in low-resource settings. Regarding scientific publishing, major obstacles included limited time (75%), complexity of data analysis (58.7%), and publication costs (55%). Interest in support initiatives was high, particularly for monthly evidence summaries (88.5%) and training in artificial intelligence tools (74.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences by age, gender, and professional role, especially concerning perceived research training adequacy and data analysis difficulties.
conclusionsItalian pediatricians face substantial structural, organizational, and methodological barriers to conducting research. Despite this, they show strong motivation to engage in scientific activities and express clear needs for training, infrastructural support, and improved evaluation systems. Strengthening funding opportunities, enhancing institutional support, and streamlining ethical and administrative procedures are essential to advancing pediatric research capacity and improving future child health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.