ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Sustaining values-driven innovation in primary healthcare: a protocol for identifying implementation strategies for long-term impact (longitudinal participatory study).
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResponding to system pressures, fragmentation, and growing project fatigue in primary care, this study examines how values-driven innovations (VDIs) can be successfully embedded and sustained by (1) defining what constitutes a values-driven innovation, (2) identifying strategies and mechanisms that support long-term implementation, and (3) co-developing evidence-based sustainability indicators with stakeholders. By integrating four complementary theoretical frameworks and examining the full lifecycle from conceptualization to long-term sustainment, it generates actionable insights to strengthen enduring, values-based transformation in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a longitudinal, theory-informed, multi-stakeholder design. Over three years, we follow selected VDIs from conceptualization through long-term sustainment, using multiple data sources and repeated timepoints to capture dynamic implementation processes. An integrated conceptual framework: combining realist evaluation, the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and Normalization Process Theory, guides all phases. The three-phase design includes: (1) defining VDI and mapping the innovation landscape; (2) conducting longitudinal case studies using document analysis, serial interviews, and questionnaires; and (3) co-creating an actionable sustainability model and monitoring indicators with stakeholders. Continuous reflexive practice, triangulation, and participatory engagement ensure rigor and relevance. DISCUSSION: Despite the analytical complexity of using multiple frameworks, this integration provides a comprehensive understanding of sustainability and contextual adaptation in primary care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp (reference number 2025-7124).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.